Cleveland·Miami·Basel·Tel AvivForce Multipliers  ·  Elevate Humanity
Growth Equity  ·  03 Apr 2025

The Hurdle Rate, Defined Against Market Convention

The hurdle rate centers on 8% in private equity, but the compounding basis, the start of the clock and the catch-up decide what it protects.

Peleg ChevionBy Peleg Chevion, Managing Partner 9 min read  ·  Growth Equity
In this note07 · 9 min
  1. The Definition and the Hard Hurdle
  2. The Convention Table
  3. The Compounding Basis and the Clock
  4. The Catch-Up
  5. Where Mid-Market Life Sciences Bends
  6. Carry Character Under Section 1061
  7. Frequently asked questions

The hurdle rate is the return limited partners must receive on contributed capital before a manager earns carried interest. Market convention centers on 8% in private equity, but the number is the least informative part of the clause. The compounding basis, the start of the clock and the catch-up decide what the hurdle protects, and in mid-market life sciences those three terms matter more than the headline rate.

01The Definition and the Hard Hurdle

A hurdle rate, also called a preferred return, is a threshold inside the distribution waterfall. It is not a fee and it is not a promised yield. Cambridge Associates defines it as the minimum annual return that must be achieved before the general partner can receive any performance-based compensation. If the portfolio never clears the threshold, the limited partners keep every dollar of profit and the manager earns no carry.

The Institutional Limited Partners Association drew the line that matters most in its ILPA Principles 3.0. Under a hard hurdle, the general partner's carried interest is based only on the portion of profits that exceed the limited partners' preferred return. ILPA says the carry calculation should ideally use a hard hurdle and that a general partner may consider one to foster a greater alignment of interest. A soft hurdle works differently: once the threshold is met, the manager collects carry on all profits, usually through a catch-up. The same 8% therefore produces two different results.

ILPA also treats a whole-of-fund waterfall, in which all contributions plus the preferred return come back first, as best practice, and asks that carry be calculated on net rather than gross profits. Each position changes what the hurdle measures, which is why the rate cannot be read in isolation.

02The Convention Table

The table sets out preferred-return practice by strategy from two public datasets: the Goodwin Procter fund terms database, summarized in November 2023 and May 2024, and the Cambridge Associates fund terms study published in August 2024, covering fund documents reviewed in 2022. Every figure is market convention as those sources report it; the final column is analysis.

StrategyPrevailing hurdleCalculation basisCatch-up conventionBearing on mid-market life sciences
All private fundsMore than half at 8%; 7% is second at 16% of funds (Goodwin)About half compounding interest, 38% IRR, 12% a percentage of amounts drawn or committed (Goodwin)Varies by strategy; 45% of all funds reviewed in 2022 at 100%, 33% with none (Cambridge Associates)The baseline for any negotiated departure.
Private equity and buyoutNearly 80% at 8% (Goodwin); buyout first quartile, median and third quartile all at 8.0% (Cambridge Associates)Compounding and IRR close to evenly split (Goodwin)Usually 100% (Goodwin); 75% of buyout funds at 100%, 14% at 80%, 7% with none (Cambridge Associates)The reference point most limited partnership agreements are measured against.
Growth equityFirst quartile 7.5%, median 8.0%, third quartile 8.0%; 35% of funds reviewed used at least one hurdle-style threshold, the first typically 200% or 250% (Cambridge Associates)Not separately reported49% at 100%, 33% with none, 12% at 80%, 7% at 50% (Cambridge Associates)The closest analogue. A multiple-of-capital threshold does not grow with time, which fits value recognized at milestones.
Venture capitalThe majority of US venture funds have no hurdle; hurdles are much more common outside the US (Goodwin). Only 12% of venture funds reviewed had a conventional preferred-return waterfall, about half of those at 8% and half at 6% or 7% (Cambridge Associates)Tiered carry triggered at 2x, 2.5x or 3x of commitments or contributions was most common (Cambridge Associates)63% with none, 30% at 100% (Cambridge Associates); usually 100% after payment of a preferred return (Goodwin)A mandate that invests earlier on the development curve inherits venture drafting, where protection usually sits in the carry tiers.
Private creditMajority between 5% and 7% (Goodwin); median 7.0% (Cambridge Associates)Not separately reported52% at 100%, 18% at 80%, 15% at 85%, 12% at 50% (Cambridge Associates)Relevant by analogy to royalty and structured instruments, whose return is largely contractual.
InfrastructureAbout half at 8%, with 7% and 7.5% next (Goodwin); first quartile, median and third quartile all at 8.0% (Cambridge Associates)Compounding and IRR close to evenly split (Goodwin)About a quarter at 100%, a third at 80%, a third at 50% (Goodwin)Shows that a partial catch-up is market where returns are yield-driven.
Real estateOnly 29% at 8%; 7% and 9% almost as common (Goodwin). Cambridge Associates reports first quartile, median and third quartile all at 8.0%; the two samples differ on this pointCompounding and IRR close to evenly split (Goodwin)More likely 50/50 (Goodwin); 72% at 50% (Cambridge Associates)A precedent for a split catch-up, not a template for operating companies.

First, 8% is a convention, and in the Goodwin data it is most uniform in private equity. Second, the strategies closest to life sciences growth investing, growth equity and venture capital, are exactly where the conventional preferred return gives way to multiple-of-capital thresholds and tiered carry. The two datasets also measure differently: the Goodwin catch-up statement describes funds after payment of a preferred return, while the Cambridge Associates figures include venture funds with no preferred return at all.

03The Compounding Basis and the Clock

Goodwin identifies three ways an agreement computes the hurdle: a compounding interest rate, an internal rate of return, or a percentage of amounts drawn or committed. The compounding approach is the most common across all funds. The difference widens with time.

Consider an illustrative single contribution of 100 held before any distribution. At 8% compounded annually, the limited partners must receive about 146.9 after five years and about 171.4 after seven years before the hurdle is met. At 8% simple interest, the corresponding amounts are 140 and 156. The arithmetic is generic and describes no particular agreement.

The clock matters as much as the rate. ILPA's position is that the preferred return should run from the date capital is called from limited partners to the point of distribution, and that where a bridging facility such as a subscription line of credit is used, it should run from the date capital is at risk. A facility of that kind funds investments before limited partners are called, so the two start dates diverge, and a hurdle measured only from the capital call accrues for less time than the capital has actually been deployed. The drafting question is when the clock starts, and the answer belongs in the definition itself.

04The Catch-Up

The catch-up is the tier that converts a hurdle into a timing device. After the limited partners receive their capital and preferred return, a catch-up allocates a share of subsequent distributions to the manager until the manager holds its full carry percentage of total profit. Cambridge Associates describes the common form as allocating 100% of profits to the general partner until it has received an amount equal to its carried-interest percentage multiplied by aggregate profits, and notes the allocation can be as low as 50%.

An illustration shows the effect, using the 20% carry Cambridge Associates found in almost three-fourths of funds it reviewed. Assume contributions of 100, total profit of 50, and an accrued preferred return of 20.

  1. Hard hurdle, no catch-up. Carry applies only to the 30 above the preferred return. The manager receives 6 and the limited partners receive 44 of the profit.
  2. Full catch-up at 100%. After the limited partners take 20, the manager takes the next 5, at which point it holds 20% of the 25 distributed. The remaining 25 splits 80/20. The manager receives 10 and the limited partners 40, exactly as if there were no hurdle.
  3. Partial catch-up at 50%. The catch-up runs for about 13.3 of distributions, half to each side, before the manager holds 20% of profit. The manager again ends at 10, but the catch-up completes only once total profit reaches about 33.3, compared with 25 under a full catch-up.

Once profit is large enough, a full or partial catch-up erases the hurdle's economic effect and leaves only its timing effect. The hurdle protects limited partners at the margin, in the band of outcomes between a weak result and a good one. That is why the catch-up percentage deserves as much negotiation as the rate itself.

05Where Mid-Market Life Sciences Bends

A compounding hurdle charges for time. For a portfolio company whose value is recognized at discrete clinical, regulatory or reimbursement decisions, the passage of time and the creation of value move on different schedules. A twelve-month regulatory delay raises a compounding hurdle even when the thesis is intact.

A multiple-of-capital threshold behaves differently. Where such a threshold operates as the gate to carry, the arithmetic of the convention is instructive: a single contribution compounding at 8% annually reaches 2x in about nine years and 2.5x in about twelve. A 2x threshold is therefore more demanding than an 8% compounding hurdle for shorter holds and less demanding for longer ones. Cambridge Associates found that 35% of growth equity funds it reviewed used at least one hurdle-style threshold, typically at 200% or 250%, and that in many venture funds such thresholds step the carry percentage up to a higher tier.

The position this supports is narrow. In mid-market life sciences, the headline hurdle rate is a weaker signal of alignment than three adjacent terms: whether the hurdle is hard or soft, when the clock starts, and how fast the catch-up runs. A conventional 8% with a full catch-up and a clock that starts at the capital call can protect limited partners less than a lower rate with a hard hurdle measured from the date capital is at risk.

06Carry Character Under Section 1061

The hurdle governs the amount and timing of carry; federal tax law governs its character. Internal Revenue Code section 1061, added by section 13309 of Public Law 115-97, applies to an applicable partnership interest, defined as an interest transferred to or held by a taxpayer in connection with the performance of substantial services in an applicable trade or business. For a holder of such an interest, net long-term capital gain is recharacterized as short-term capital gain to the extent it would not qualify as long-term under a three-year holding period instead of the ordinary one-year period.

Two features bear on how the waterfall is drafted. Section 1061(c)(4)(B) excludes a capital interest that gives the holder a right to share in partnership capital commensurate with the capital contributed, which is how a manager's own invested capital is kept apart from its carry. The final regulations under Treasury Regulation section 1.1061-4(b)(7), issued in T.D. 9945, exclude from the computation long-term gain under sections 1231 and 1256 and qualified dividends under section 1(h)(11)(B). Neither the hurdle nor the catch-up changes the character of carry; the tax rule measures holding period, not the waterfall.

07Frequently asked questions

What is the market-standard hurdle rate in private equity?

The most common preferred return is 8%. Goodwin Procter reports that nearly 80% of private equity funds in its database use 8%, and Cambridge Associates found the buyout first quartile, median and third quartile all at 8.0% among funds it reviewed in 2022. Venture capital is the main exception: most US venture funds have no hurdle.

What is the difference between a hard hurdle and a soft hurdle?

Under a hard hurdle, carried interest is paid only on profits above the preferred return. Under a soft hurdle, once the threshold is met the manager earns carry on all profits, usually through a catch-up. ILPA Principles 3.0 says the carry calculation should ideally use a hard hurdle.

Does the hurdle rate affect how carried interest is taxed?

No. The hurdle affects how much carry is paid and when. Character is governed by Internal Revenue Code section 1061, which treats gain on an applicable partnership interest as short-term capital gain unless it satisfies a three-year holding period, with exclusions for certain capital interests and, under the final regulations, for section 1231 gain, section 1256 gain and qualified dividends.

Nothing in this piece is investment, legal, tax or accounting advice, and nothing in it is an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security.

Contact

Tell us where this note is wrong. That is a useful message.

Back to insights